It is no great secret I don’t have much love for movie adaptations of comics. I have expressed my feelings on this issue plenty. I don’t like Hollywood and I don’t like most of the crap that flows like a river out of it. However, I know that the morons that run that cesspool (Wow, I sort-of sound like Joe Leiberman or Tipper Gore or one of those fascists, but for completely different reasons. Hmmm.) will never stop making my medium into crappy films.
Well, I have a new reason to hate them. Rich Johnston of Bleedingcool.com found a couple of priceless quotes from moron public relations people (yes, I know… it’s redundant) promoting Spartacus: Blood and Sand (some gladiator show on Starz.) You can read his full story at www.bleedingcool.com/2010/01/24/im-spartacus-but-i-am-not-a-graphic-novel/, but the comments that really bore into my skin and the reason for the Johnston article refer to the shows style as “graphic novel” like. Take this quote for example, “We always wanted to tell this story in a very graphic novel way.” They refer to the special effects as “graphic novel” like. Unless it is done with FREAK’N pictures, it isn’t going to be even anywhere close to a graphic novel!!!!
Johnston says the press release for Sherlock Holmes stated the movie was based on a graphic novel – which as far as anyone knows, does not exist.
So, besides being lazy, ignorant and unable to read, what would be the reasons for constantly referring to comics? (Granted I’m sure the *&%#ing idiots do not even have the foggiest idea what an actual graphic novel is and would certainly not know the difference between a comic, a collected edition or collected work and a graphic novel, but like always, I digress.)
I can only come up with the thoughts that comics are so far superior then the absolute &%$# they have been getting from “real” writers over the last few years, that our superior medium must look like it is packed with geniuses galore. Books, having SO many pages and words are just too time consuming and… long or like Steven Spielbergo said a few years ago, before he put out yet another terrible Jones film and after directing Road to Perdition, that he needed to make more films based on graphic storytelling – these are already story boarded.
Now, granted, what happens when the untalented hacks get done failing with film? We let them come and write bad comics – Kevin Smith, Reginald Hudlin, Dick Donner, the list goes on and on – and then over promote their crap, probably saying it is very film like in its storytelling. I quit.
Walking Dead on TV…
So why am I telling you that it looks like The Walking Dead is finally going to be made into a TV series and Frank Darabont might direct the pilot episode? I don’t know. Maybe because I respect Darabont as a creator and The Mist is one of the best horror movies I’ve ever seen. Maybe, I thought you’d care. Here, go read for yourself:
www.shocktillyoudrop.com/news/topnews.php?id=13750
Then ask Robert Kirkman some time, if you see him, about how much his “co-creator” Tony Moore is making off the rights. Do it, I double dog dare you.
Local kid cast as Conan?…
Does this make us all Cimmerian’s? (Pronounced with a hard C, say it like carrot… Ka-marry-anne. Good.) Jason Moma, who grew up In Norwalk (yep, the same home town as Superman) has the part. His biggest roles were in Stargate: Atlantis and Baywatch. Moma is a big guy and certainly looks the part of the barbarian. For his sake though, I hope Iowa Native has a better big movie first casting then Brandon Routh did (and it most certainly wasn’t Routh’s fault in Superman either.)
I don’t know how good this will be. The director is known for the remake of Friday the 13th and they are talking about having Conan’s father in it (to possibly be played by Mickey Rourke.) We don’t need an origin story for a barbarian warrior, we need cleaving of giant flying ape men, an evil sorcerer and mostly naked damsels being in a great degree of distress. Conan is not brain surgery, though it is amazing how much bad Conan has been done – in comic, prose and film.
I hope it is good…. But… I just don’t have faith.
But on to good things, like REAL paper comics…
Switching subjects to good, happy, positive things. So… what is coming out this week? Hmmm, could it be… BATMAN AND FREAK’N ROBIN!!!?!!! Yes, after a month off the title returns and with MUCH better art. Cameron Stewart, the man who worked with Grant Morrison on Sea Guy, will be behind the pencil this arc.
Thank Dio, because was it just me or was Phillip Tan’s art so bad it made you want to skip the pictures and just read the balloons? Double sized bad on it was, the only reason he was on the book was to promote his art chores on the editor in chief’s stint on the then upcoming Outsiders! How bad are you when you need THAT kind of help (writer or artist) or how bad is Outsiders?
I’m going to again mention two, what I would consider, underperforming Marvel books due out this week; Daredevil and Fantastic Four. If you don’t read them and are looking for a solid, well written super-hero stories, give them a try.
If you are reading the Blackest Night series and need a little bit more, I am going to guess the Atom and Hawkman #46 due out this week should be pretty good. Geoff Johns is writing and Ryan Sook is doing art… Yes, that Ryan Sook, we don’t get his art very often, so take advantage. I haven’t read all of the one shots and specials, but the ones I have, have been pretty good. I think overall for a giant universe spanning crossover it has been better than the ones of recent years.
Starman #81, which was also one of those cancelled, now revived DC Blackest Night books, was actually really, really good. It reminds me why I loved that series when it was coming out. James Robinson, when he isn’t writing bad Superman books, can be a good writer.
So, why do those Superman books suck so bad? I think, if you read the Starman issue you see why. Robinson tells a great character driven story. The great revel is slow and deliberate, not the big bang that is, I’m sure, required from the Superman stories. If Robinson was allowed to write a book where we could see Clark Kent on an assignment for the Daily Planet and dealing with his day to day troubles, I’m sure it would be good. However, DC has long taken the character of Clark Kent out of Superman, to the detriment of the character, and the poor writers who have been stuck on the book. But that is just my two cents, I could be wrong.








